Eight Dimensions of AI-Native Design
The cleanest break with the old frame: components become conversations, states become spectrums. My demos stream and blend instead of flipping for exactly this reason.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗POSITIONS · AI-NATIVE DESIGN
Not an essay wall - every position here is already published on this site, next to the reading or artifact it argues for. This page gathers them in one scan. The quotes are the notes as published; the links go to where they live.
The interface is not a conversation with a text box bolted on. States become spectrums, surfaces assemble themselves, and what stays fixed is grammar, not layout.
The cleanest break with the old frame: components become conversations, states become spectrums. My demos stream and blend instead of flipping for exactly this reason.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗Generative UI is mainstream now. The design question is what stays fixed when the surface assembles itself - and the answer is grammar, not layout.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗Smashing Magazine makes the case that the point-and-click contract is ending: intent-driven design collapses the ten-click flow into one stated goal, and the designer’s job shifts from drawing screens to guiding transparent agent behaviour. A mainstream design publication saying the best interface is no interface moves the idea from niche to canon.
lives at /fresh ↗ source ↗Thesys ships OUI-1, an open-weight DiffusionGemma finetune that writes interfaces in OpenUI Lang and scores 71.7% on the Generative UI Benchmark, 5.5x its base model. Diffusion decoding writes 256-token blocks at once, so interfaces stream in under a second on an RTX 5090. Generative UI stops needing a datacenter.
lives at /fresh ↗ source ↗An agent needs to know what a thing is, not what it looks like. The semantic contract under the pixels - most sites, mine included, are still catching up.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗Intuitive for people, structured for machines. Automated traffic has passed human traffic; be legible to both or illegible to one.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗The model will be slow, wrong and confident - sometimes in the same answer. The interface carries that honestly: reasoning visible, uncertainty admitted, evidence attached.
The textbook. User needs, mental models, trust - less fashionable than the agent discourse and more useful when you actually ship.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗A pattern playbook with the right spine: show the reasoning, admit the uncertainty, hand control back. Closest to how I grade my own demos.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗Most streaming UI fakes liveness with shimmer. BoardUI’s web search draws each source as it opens - the motion is the evidence arriving, not decoration over a wait. That is the difference between animation as progress and animation as theater.
lives at /atlas ↗ source ↗Linear designed boundaries instead of paths: system prompt, tool design, run scope and the harness underneath are where the behaviour is shaped. Script it too tightly and you dilute the flexibility that makes an agent useful - the agent-design trade in one line.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗Automation is a dial, not a destination. The design work is deciding where the person steers, approves, interrupts and recovers - then building exactly those surfaces.
Users evaluate an agent the way they evaluate a colleague - reliable, restrained, honest about what it did. Restraint as a design material. That one idea rewires a roadmap.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗Sixteen patterns across delegate, steer, approve, interrupt, recover. The control-surface checklist alone is worth the read.
lives at /sources ↗ source ↗AIAI clusters research and retrieves patterns.
MEI verify sources, separate signal from repetition, and decide what is trustworthy.
AIAI generates competing problem frames.
MEI choose the frame that connects user behavior to the business constraint.
AIAI widens the option space.
MEI set principles, reject weak patterns and select a direction deliberately.
AIAI accelerates variants and working prototypes.
MEI decide what the prototype must prove and preserve interaction quality.
AIAI helps synthesize evidence.
MEI inspect contradictions, resist false certainty and own the final recommendation.
A static screen of an AI product proves nothing - the behaviour is the product. So the evidence on this site runs.
The positions hold together as a map and a ruleset, not a pile of takes.